Deploying Nonstandard Workers 134 93
Organizational Structure Perspective - With reference to Japanese Workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss10.614Abstract
Ample writings on organizational structure have devoted to theorization and empiricism-based discussions of structural arrangements for standard (or regular) workers in organizations.However, theorizations, debates and discussions on organizational structural arrangements for nonstandard (or non-regular) workers seem to be rare. Aim of this study is to bring out structural possibilities for deploying nonstandard workers while reviewing the literature on newly emerging organizational structures and with the support of empirical evidence in the Japanese workplace. Present study recognizes that the nonstandard work arrangements can be facilitated by the emerging new structures of work organizations. Such arrangements predict the possibility of deploying nonstandard workers in numerous ways still allowing them the freedom to adapt a flexible and agile career of their own. Thus, the structures alike virtual, networked, process-based, team-based etc. would provide the stage for both workers and the organizations to fulfill their expectations.
References
Ariga, K., Kambayashi, R. & Sano, Y. (Autumn, 2009). The effect of training policy for non-regular employees and human resource management practices, (Special Edition on Human Resource Management of Atypical Employment), Japan Labor Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 12-41.
Barker, K. & Chrostensen, K. (Ed.) (1998). Contingent work: American employment relations in transition. London: Cornell university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501720864
Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M. (1961). Management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
Christensen, K. (1998). Countervailing human resource trends in family-sensitive firms. In K. Barker and K. Christensen (eds.), Contingent work: American employment relations in transition. London: Cornell university press.
Daft, R. L. (2012). Organization theory and design, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Donaldson, L. (2002). The contingency theory of organizations. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249
European Industrial Relations Dictionary (2011). Dictionary on-line, retrieved through http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrialrelations/dictionary/
Fu, H. (2012). An emerging non-regular labor force in Japan: The dignity of dispatched workers. London: Routldge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806869
Fujimoto, M. & Kimura, T. (Spring, 2005). Business strategy and human resource management at contract companies in the manufacturing sector, Japan Labor Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 104-122.
Fujimoto, M. (2007). HRM of Japanese corporates with regard to conversion to standard employment from non-standard employment, Chapter 7, Retrieved through www.esri.go.jp/ jp/workshop/070706/02_07.pdf
Ghosh, D., Willinger, G. L., & Ghosh, S. (2009). A firm’s external environment and the hiring of a non-standard workforce: implications for organizations. Human Resource Management Journal, 19 (4), pp. 433-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00109.x
Gleason, S. E. (Ed.) (2006). The shadow workforce: Perspectives on contingent work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, Michigan: Kalamazoo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17848/9781429454889
Houseman, S. & Osawa, M. (Ed.), (2003). Nonstandard work in developed economies: Causes and consequences, Michigan; Kalamazoo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17848/9781417505326
Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training (2007). Survey on conversion system of part-time and contract workers, No. 32, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training (2011a). Labor situation in Japan and analysis: Detailed exposition 2011/2012, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training (2011b). Non-regular employment – Issues and challenges common to the major developed countries. No. 10, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training (2015). Labor situation in Japan and analysis: Detailed exposition 2014/2015, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University.
Lips-Wiersma, M. & Judith Mcmorland. (2006). Finding Meaning and Purpose in Boundaryless Careers: A Framework for Study and Practice. Journal of Humanistic Psychology Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 147-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167805283776
Lundy, M. C., Roberts, K. & Becker, D. (2006). Union responses to the challenges of contingent work arrangements. In Sandra E. Gleason (Ed.), The shadow workforce: Perspectives on contingent work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, (pp. 99-132). Michigan: Kalamazoo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17848/9781429454889.Ch4
McCourt, W. & Eldridge, D. (2003). Global human resource management: Managing people in developing and transitional countries, UK: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950104
Michon, F. (2011). Survey on Non-regular employment in France: A profile. In JILPT Report (2011). Non-regular employment – Issues and challenges common to the major developed countries. No. 10, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Morhman, S.A., Cohen, S.A., & Morhman, Jr., A.M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York: The Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan, (2005). The White Paper on the Labor Economy 2005, retrieved through http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/l-economy/2005/index.html
Mitani, N. (2008). Mandatory retirement of baby boomer and human resource strategies of business firms, Japan Labor Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 07-33.
Nadler, D.A. & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A congruence model for organizational assessment. In E.E. Lawler, D.A. Nadler, & C. Camman (Eds.), Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of working life. New York: Wiley.
Okutsu, M. & Kuniyoshi, M. (2010). Resignation and reemployment during the period of marriage, childbirth and childrearing – Women’s career development and issues – Summary, JILPT Research Report No. 105. Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Ozeki, C. & Wakisaka, A. (2006). Japan’s growing shadow workforce. In Sandra E. Gleason (ed.), The shadow workforce: Perspectives on contingent work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, (pp. 203-239). Michigan: Kalamazoo.Pugh, D.S. & Hickson, D.J. (2007). Contingency theory of organizations. London: Pickering & Chatto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17848/9781429454889.Ch7
Sano, Y. (2012). Conversion of non-regular employees into regular employees and working experiences and skills development of non-regular employees at Japanese companies, Japan Labor Review, 9(3), 99-126.
Slater, G. (2011). Non-regular employment in the United Kingdom. In JILPT Report (2011). Non-regular employment – Issues and challenges common to the major developed countries. No. 10, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Wooden, M. & Warren, D. (2003). The characteristics of casual and fixed-term employment: Evidence from the HILDA survey, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 15/03, Australia: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
Valenzuela, A. (2011). Non-regular employment in the United States: a profile. In JILPT Report (2011). Non-regular employment – Issues and challenges common to the major developed countries. No. 10, Japan: Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training.
Zeytinglu, I. U. & Cooke, G. B. (2002). Summary, implications and future research directions of flexible work arrangements. In I. U. Zeytinglu (ed.). Flexible work arrangements: Conceptualizations and international experiences, London: Kluwer Law International.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Kumudinei Dissanayake
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.