An Analysis of the Classification System in Chinese Courtroom Discourse 82 76

Authors

  • Guang Shi Nanjing Normal University, China Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss11.480

    Keywords:

    Courtroom Discourse, Classification, Goal, Overlexicalization

    Abstract

    This paper analyzes the classification resources in the audio recording transcripts of three trials in China. The findings indicate that: 1) courtroom participants with opposite goals tend to use expressions with different and even opposite meanings to classify the same things, incidents and concepts which are related to the dispute focuses, 2) courtroom participants with the same goals tend to have similar or congruent classifications of the same things, incidents and concepts involved in the cases, and 3) a prominent feature of courtroom discourse is overlexicalization, the analysis of which is conducive to our understanding of the stances, views and claims of related courtroom participants.

    Author Biography

    • Guang Shi, Nanjing Normal University, China

      School of Foreign Languages and Cultures

    References

    Bennett, W. L. & M.S. Feldman.1981. Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Diamond J. 1996. Status and power in verbal interaction: a study of discourse in a close-knit social network. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.40

    Eades, D. 2010. Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692559

    Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

    Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew (eds.). 1979. Language and control. London Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Xin, B. 2005. Critical Linguistics: Theory and Application. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

    Liao, M. Z. 2003. A Study on Courtroom Questions, Responses and Their Interaction: A Linguistic Perspective. Beijing: Law Press.

    Liao, M. Z. 2009a. The Principle of Goal Direction and Goal Analysis 1. Foreign Language Research (4): 62-64.

    Liao, M. Z. 2009b. The Principle of Goal Direction and Goal Analysis 2 . Foreign Language Research (6): 101-109.

    Downloads

    Published

    2015-11-01

    How to Cite

    Shi, G. (2015). An Analysis of the Classification System in Chinese Courtroom Discourse. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(11), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss11.480