Parental Involvement In English Literacy Homework With Primary School Learners

Authors

  • Christabel Belinda Rooi Cape Peninsula University of Technology image/svg+xml Author
    • Dr. Beatrice Thuynsma Cape Peninsula University of Technology image/svg+xml Author

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol1.iss2.104

      Keywords:

      Emancipation, partnership, parental involvement, homework, intervention programme

      Abstract

      The aim of this research is to explore parental involvement within an English Literacy intervention programme focusing on a group of Grade 4 primary school learners. The study postulate that active involvement of parents in their children’s education can enhance learning, and argues that in order for learners and parents to actively engage with the learning processes they should become more emancipated in the process. Therefore the main focus is that parents can be assisted by educators, to scaffold the learning processes of their children.
      The study is framed by a qualitative approach, to which the parents of identified learners were invited. The programme was implemented to investigate the benefits of parental involvement in after school homework activities. A small multilingual focus group was formed to determine the success (es) of this programme. A research paradigm was used to lean towards a critical theory paradigm framed by an action research model.

      75 70

      Author Biographies

      • Christabel Belinda Rooi, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

        Master of Education, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences

      • Dr. Beatrice Thuynsma, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

        Supervisor

      References

      Anderson, G. 1987. Fundamentals of Educational Research. 2nd ed.USA

      Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. 2001. The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

      Brown, H.D. 2007. Principles of Language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. [4] Carrasquillo, A. & Clement, B.G. 1993. Parents and schools: a source book. London: Garland

      Publishing House.

      Carson, T. 1990. What kind of knowing Is critical action research? Theory into Practice. Teacher as Researcher, 29 (3):167- 173. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1476919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543450

      Coleman,M. 2013. Empowering family-teacher partnerships. Building connections within diverse communities. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452240510

      Dos Reis, K.M. 2007. The influence of gansterism on the morale of educators on the Cape Flats,

      Western Cape. Unpublished Med thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town. [8] Duffy, K. & Scott, P. A. 1998. Viewing an old issue through a new lens: a critical theory insight into the education - practice gap. Nurse Education Today, (18): 183 - 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(98)80077-4

      Fairclough,N. 2001. Language and Power 2nd ed. London: Longman.

      Feldman, A. 2007. Validity and quality in action research. Educational Action Research. 15 (1): 21-32. March. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790601150766

      Fer, S. 2004. Qualitative evaluation of emotional intelligence in-service program for secondary school teachers. The Qualitative Report: 9 (4) 562-588: [29/12/2011].

      Ferrance, E. 2000. Themes in education: Action Research. LAB: Northeast and Islands Regional

      Educational, [05/ 2008]. http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf

      Fouché, C.B. & De Vos, A. 2005. Problem formulation. Research at grassroots for the social sciences and human sciences professions. 3rd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

      Garland, S. 2011. Bloom’s taxonomy: Critical thinking skills for kids.

      http://www.exquisite- minds.com/ideas-of-the-week/blooms-taxonomy-critical- thinking-

      skills/. [11/08/2013].

      Henry, C. & Kemmis, S. 1985. A point-by-point guide to action research for teachers. The Australian Administrator School of Education, 6 (4):1-4.

      Horkheimer, M. 1982. Critical theory. New York: Seabury Press.

      Hornby, G. & Lafaele, R. 2011. Barriers to parental involvement in education: an explanatory model. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8379-4

      Educational Review. 63 (1):37-52. February.

      Kemmis, S. 2001. Exploring the relevance of critical theory: emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In: Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds). Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry & Practice, London: Sage: 91-102.

      Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. 1988. The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

      Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. 1990. The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press. [21] Lilly, E. & Green, C. 2004. Developing partnerships with families through children’s literature.

      New Jersey: Pearson.

      McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. 1993. Research in education: a conceptual introduction, 3rd ed. Harper Collins.

      McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. 2010. Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. 7th ed.

      New York: Pearson.

      Mestry, R. & Grobler, B. 2007. Collaboration and communication as effective strategies for parent involvement in public school. Educational research and review. 2 (7): 176 – 185. July.

      National Reading Strategy. 2008. Republic of South Africa. Department of Education

      Rabiee, F. 2004. Focus group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399

      (63): 655-660.

      Riding, P., Fowell, S. & Levy, P. 1995. An action research approach to curriculum development.

      Information Research, 1(1): http://InformationR.net/ir/1-1/paper2.html © the authors.

      Sands, D.J., Kozleski, E.B. & French, N.K. 2000. Inclusive education for the 21st Century. A new introduction to special education. Canada: Wadsworth.

      Somekh, B & Zeichner, K. 2009. Action research for educational reform: remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. An Educational and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University. Educational Action Research. 17(1): 5–21. March. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402

      /12/2011].

      South Africa. National Department of Education, 2002. Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R – 9 (Schools): Language First Additional. Pretoria: DoE.

      South Africa. Western Cape Education Department, 2007. 0065(2007). Curriculum Development Minute: DCD/0065/07. Pamphlet encouraging parents to support learners with homework. Cape Town: PGWC.

      Van Der Horst, H. & McDonald, R. 1997. OBE Outcomes-Based Education. A teacher’s Manuel.

      Cape Town: Kagiso.

      Van Niekerk, L. 2007. Listening and language homework programme. Level two: I listen with my ears. Observatory: Future Managers.

      Van Wyk, N. & Lemmer, E. 2009.Organising parent involvement in SA schools. Cape Town: Juta. [34] Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E. & Gresham, F. M. 2004. Antisocial behaviour in school: Evidence- based practices. 2nd ed. Canada: Wadsworth.

      Wolfendale, S. 1992. Empowering parents and teachers: working for children.New York: Cassell.

      Downloads

      Published

      2013-10-01

      How to Cite

      Rooi, C. B., & Thuynsma, D. B. (2013). Parental Involvement In English Literacy Homework With Primary School Learners. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 1(2), 36-66. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol1.iss2.104